Stage and Cinema film and theatre reviews
 

 

DEAD ON ARRIVAL

  

picture - Incident at VichyTheater Review

by Harvey Perr

published March 20, 2009

 

Incident at Vichy

now playing Off Broadway at the Beckett on Theater Row

through April 11

 

If you’ve never spent ninety minutes with a corpse, awaiting the embalmer, then I recommend a visit to the Beckett Theatre where TACT (The Actors Company Theatre) is reviving Arthur Miller’s Incident at Vichy. I recognize that any theater critic who pronounces a play by one of our preeminent playwrights, especially one that deals with personal responsibility on a serious moral level, as dead on arrival, is in one of those dreaded “damned-if-I-do-damned-if-I-don’t” situations. Well, I’m damned if I’m going to call this dispiriting and numbing experience anything but what it is. This is not a play; it is an argument. It is not that arguments cannot come alive in the theater, but, in order for that to happen, there must be a dramatic event.

 

If Harold Clurman, a director who knew something about creating dramatic events in the theater, could not keep the original production from inertness, even with a cast that included Joseph Wiseman, David Wayne, Hal Holbrook and Michael Strong, it seems an act of sheer chutzpah on the part of Scott Alan Evans to attempt to resurrect the play with a cast of journeyman actors who go through the motions of acting without seeming to grasp hold of their characters and their connection to each other. It is partly due to the fact that these are not so much real people in a real situation as they are archetypes and, worse, stereotypes, and it is partly due to the fact that Miller is guiding them through an illustrated lecture.

 

The situation is tense enough. A group of men – mostly Jews and one gypsy and one non-Jew, a prince named Von Berg – are detained in a courtyard in Vichy, France, during the Nazi occupation, waiting to be sent to deportation trains (if their papers are not in order) and their ultimate deaths. This information alone is enough to scream significance to an easily vulnerable audience and, surely, during its original run, and in subsequent productions, there have been a handful of reviewers who stood up against the naysayers and called the play important.  And, in outline, it is. The illegality of the detention makes it not just a play about the horrors of the Holocaust, but a living reminder of our own recent past in Guantanamo. But Miller is asking us to be moved by what we already know, not by what he depicts. It is only in the final confrontation between the intellectual Jew Leduc and the elegant Von Berg that a real conflict arises and, by some odd directorial choice of seeming to slough it off as an ordinary and curiously indifferent act, it further flattens an already flat production.

 

Many sane and decent people have tried for years to prove that Incident at Vichy is Arthur Miller‘s neglected masterpiece. This still-born production doesn’t make a strong case in its favor. 

 

harveyperr @ stageandcinema.com

 

 

 
home
film
NYC theater
LA theater
DVD
Contests
interviews
extras
movie posters
links
privacy statement
contact us
site map

 

CLICK HERE TO PRINT THIS PAGE

Follow stageandcinema on Twitter

facebook logo